Skip to content
TOEFLIBTee

TOEFL iBT Speaking Sample Q & A – FULL Test 6

SpeakingUpdated 12 min read

About the test format

This practice set follows the format of the TOEFL iBT Speaking section used before August 2019, which had six tasks (two independent opinion questions plus four integrated tasks based on reading and listening material). The prompts, passages, listening scripts, and sample answers below are original TOEFLIBTee material written in that older style, so there is no audio to accompany them — read the listening script the way you would listen to it, then answer as if you had heard it. Since January 2026, Speaking uses two different task types, Listen and Repeat and Take an Interview, but these prompts, scripts, and sample answers are still useful for practicing clear, well-organized spoken summaries and opinions.

This is an original TOEFLIBTee speaking practice set with two example answers for every prompt, written in the style of the pre-2019 six-task Speaking section (see the note above). The current test doesn't use these tasks, so here is how to get value from the set today:

  • Prompts 1 and 2: answer each one out loud in about 45 seconds, then compare your answer with Examples A and B. Talking about your own experiences and opinions this way is good practice for the kind of personal questions you may hear in the Take an Interview task.
  • Prompts 3 to 6: have someone read the listening script to you (or read it aloud once yourself), take short notes, and summarize it out loud before you look at the examples. This builds the note-taking and academic listening you need for the Listening section.
  • Listen and Repeat practice: the example answers are full of clear, natural sentences. Record five of them, play each one back, and repeat it word for word.

Prompt 1

Describe an object you own that has strong sentimental value to you. Explain why it's meaningful.

Example A

The object I treasure most is a small wooden clock that sits on my desk. It belonged to my grandfather, who built it himself when he was a young man learning woodworking. After he passed away, my father gave it to me because I was the grandchild who used to sit with him in his workshop and watch him work. Every time I look at it, I remember the smell of sawdust and the sound of his tools, and it reminds me to slow down and be patient with things, the way he always was. It doesn't even keep perfect time anymore, but I would never replace it with something more accurate.

Example B

I have a friendship bracelet that my best friend made for me the summer before she moved to another country. We were both thirteen, and I remember she spent almost a whole afternoon braiding the threads while we sat on her porch. We don't get to see each other often anymore since we live so far apart, but I still keep the bracelet in a drawer where I can find it easily. Whenever I come across it while looking for something else, it brings back that whole summer immediately, and it reminds me that some friendships don't need constant contact to stay strong.

Prompt 2

Some people prefer to live in the same city their whole life. Other people prefer to move to different cities over time. In your opinion, which lifestyle is better, and why?

Example A

I think moving to different cities is better because each place teaches you something a hometown can't. When I moved to a new city for university, I had to learn to navigate public transportation by myself, find my own doctor, and make friends without any help from people who already knew me. It was uncomfortable at first, but it made me much more independent than I would have been if I had stayed close to my family the whole time. I also think seeing how people live differently in different places makes you less likely to assume that your own city's way of doing things is the only normal way.

Example B

I believe staying in one city for your whole life has real advantages that people underestimate. My parents have lived in the same city since they were born, and because of that, they know almost everyone — the shop owners, their neighbors' entire families, even the local officials. That kind of deep community connection takes decades to build, and you lose most of it every time you move somewhere new. My parents can call in favors, get honest recommendations, and feel a sense of belonging that I don't think you can get quickly in a new place, no matter how open-minded you are.

Prompt 3

Orientation Week Should Be Shortened

Currently, new-student orientation lasts five full days before classes begin. I would like to propose that the university shorten orientation to three days instead. I have two reasons for this suggestion. First, by the fourth and fifth days, most new students are exhausted from back-to-back information sessions and have stopped absorbing anything useful — the sessions on those final two days could easily be combined into the earlier days without losing important content. Second, a shorter orientation would let students move into their dorms and settle in earlier, giving them more free time to explore campus on their own before the pressure of classes begins.

Listening script

W: Did you read that proposal to cut orientation down to three days?

M: I did, and I completely disagree with it. Orientation isn't just information sessions — it's also how new students make their first friends before classes start.

W: I mean, he does have a point about people getting tired by day four though.

M: Sure, some people get tired, but that doesn't mean the days are useless. A lot of the events on days four and five are social activities, not lectures — things like the campus scavenger hunt and the welcome dinner. Those are exactly the events that help shy students meet people.

W: I hadn't thought about it that way. I just assumed the later days were more information sessions like the earlier ones.

M: Right, and if you cut those days, you're not really trimming boring lectures — you're cutting the part of orientation that actually helps people feel like they belong here before the academic pressure kicks in.

W: That's a fair point. Losing the social events would probably matter more than he realizes.

Question: Explain the man's reaction to the proposal in the letter and the reasons behind his opinion.

Example A

The letter proposes shortening new-student orientation from five days to three days, arguing that students get too tired to pay attention by the later days. The man in the conversation disagrees with this proposal. He points out that the fourth and fifth days aren't mainly information sessions — they're social events like a scavenger hunt and a welcome dinner. He argues that these events help shy students make friends before classes begin, so cutting them would remove one of the most valuable parts of orientation, not just the tiring lectures the letter writer is complaining about.

Example B

The proposal in the letter suggests cutting orientation from five days to three, claiming students stop absorbing information after a few days of sessions. In the conversation, the man strongly disagrees. He explains that the later days of orientation are mostly social activities rather than lectures, including events designed to help new students meet each other. According to him, removing those days wouldn't just shorten some repetitive information sessions — it would take away the part of orientation that helps students feel like they belong on campus before their classes start.

Prompt 4

Classical Conditioning

Some forms of learning happen without any conscious effort or reasoning at all. Classical conditioning describes a process in which a neutral stimulus, something that originally causes no particular reaction, comes to trigger a response after being repeatedly paired with a stimulus that already produces that response naturally. Over time, the previously neutral stimulus alone becomes enough to produce the response, even in the complete absence of the original stimulus that first caused it. This kind of learning happens automatically and does not require the learner to notice or understand the connection being formed.

Listening script

Here's an example you can probably relate to. Think about a coffee shop that always plays a particular short chime over its speakers right before announcing that a customer's order is ready. At first, that chime means nothing special to a new customer — it's just a sound. But if that same person visits the shop regularly, the chime gets paired, over and over, with the pleasant experience of receiving a hot drink they were looking forward to.

After enough repeated visits, something shifts. The customer starts to feel a small lift in anticipation the instant they hear that chime, even before they can see whether it's actually their order being called. Interestingly, if that same chime played somewhere else entirely, say in a store that sells shoes, with no coffee or drink involved at all, many regular customers report the same brief flicker of anticipation anyway, just from hearing the sound. The chime alone, through nothing but repetition, has picked up a reaction that originally belonged only to the coffee itself.

Question: Explain, using the coffee shop example, how the chime became linked to a response through classical conditioning.

Example A

Classical conditioning is a kind of learning where a neutral stimulus starts to trigger a response after being repeatedly paired with something that already causes that response. In the lecture, the professor uses an example of a coffee shop that plays a chime right before calling out a finished order. At first, the chime means nothing, but after a customer hears it paired with getting their drink many times, they start feeling a small burst of anticipation just from the chime alone. Interestingly, the same reaction shows up even if the chime plays somewhere unrelated, like a shoe store, showing that the sound itself, through repetition, picked up a response that originally belonged only to the coffee.

Example B

In the lecture, the professor explains classical conditioning using a coffee shop example. The shop always plays a short chime right before telling a customer their order is ready. That chime doesn't mean anything on its own at first. But because it keeps happening right before something enjoyable, getting a hot drink, regular customers eventually start to feel excited the moment they hear it, even before they know if it's their order. The professor points out that this reaction can even happen in a completely different place, like a shoe store, if the same sound is played, which shows the response is now attached to the sound itself rather than the coffee.

Prompt 5

Listening script

M: Hey, Professor Alvarez, can I ask you something about the a cappella showcase?

W: Of course, David. What's on your mind?

M: Our group agreed to learn three new songs for the showcase, but we're only about halfway through learning the first one, and the show is in three weeks.

W: That's a tight timeline. How many times a week are you rehearsing?

M: Just twice a week, an hour each time. It felt like enough when we planned it, but three songs is a lot more work than we expected.

W: Have you thought about adding an extra rehearsal each week?

M: We talked about that, but two of our members have jobs on the days we'd need to add, so we might lose them for that rehearsal.

W: What about cutting the set down to two songs instead of three? A shorter set that's polished usually goes over better with an audience than three songs that are still rough.

M: That's true. I think some of the members would be disappointed, but a solid two songs probably beats a shaky three.

Question: Describe the problem facing the group, then explain which solution discussed you would recommend and why.

Example A

The man's a cappella group agreed to perform three new songs at a showcase in three weeks, but they're only halfway through learning the first song because they only rehearse twice a week. The professor suggests two possible solutions: adding an extra rehearsal each week, or cutting the set down to two songs instead of three. I think the group should perform two songs instead of three. Adding a rehearsal sounds helpful, but the man mentions that some members have jobs on the days they'd need to add, so they might lose people at exactly the rehearsals meant to fix the problem. Performing two well-rehearsed songs would likely impress the audience more than three songs that still feel unfinished.

Example B

The problem is that the man's singing group is behind schedule — they planned to learn three songs before a showcase in three weeks, but they've only rehearsed enough to get through half of the first one. Two solutions come up in the conversation: rehearsing an extra time each week, or reducing the performance to two songs. I would recommend cutting the set to two songs. Since adding a rehearsal would cost the group some of its members due to job schedules, it isn't a very reliable fix. A shorter, well-practiced set also tends to make a stronger impression than a longer one that still sounds rough, so quality over quantity seems like the safer choice here.

Prompt 6

Listening script

When engineers design a bridge, they can't just make sure it holds up under normal conditions — they have to plan for things going wrong. Two design principles help with that.

The first is redundancy, which means building more support into the structure than the bare minimum needed to hold it up. A bridge with redundancy has multiple independent paths for weight to travel through, so if one cable or beam gets damaged or fails, the load automatically shifts onto the remaining supports instead of causing the whole structure to collapse. It's the same idea as a building having more than one staircase — you hope you never need the second one, but its presence means a single blocked exit doesn't trap everyone inside.

The second principle is load distribution, spreading weight across the structure so no single point ever carries more stress than it can safely handle. Suspension bridges do this by hanging the roadway from cables that fan the weight of traffic out across the entire span rather than concentrating it at a few support points. Between these two ideas, engineers build bridges that can absorb damage or heavy, uneven traffic without failing suddenly or all at once.

Question: Drawing on the professor's examples, explain the two design principles engineers use to keep bridges from failing.

Example A

The professor explains two design principles engineers use to prevent bridges from failing. The first is redundancy, which means building extra support so that if one cable or beam fails, the weight shifts onto the remaining supports instead of the bridge collapsing, similar to a building having a second staircase in case one exit gets blocked. The second principle is load distribution, which means spreading weight across the whole structure so no single point carries too much stress. Suspension bridges do this by hanging the road from cables that spread the weight of traffic across the entire span. Together, these two principles let bridges handle damage or heavy traffic without suddenly failing.

Example B

In the lecture, the professor talks about two principles engineers use when designing bridges. The first is redundancy, meaning the bridge has more support built in than the minimum required, so if one part is damaged, the load can shift to other supports instead of the whole bridge collapsing at once. The second is load distribution, which spreads weight evenly across the structure instead of concentrating it in one place. For example, suspension bridges hang the roadway from cables that spread traffic weight across the whole span rather than a few points. Using both principles together allows bridges to survive damage or unusually heavy traffic without a sudden, total failure.